Abstract:We investigate resonant capture of small bodies by planets that migrate inwards, using analytic arguments and three-body integrations. If the orbits of the planet and the small body are initially circular and coplanar, the small body is captured when it crosses the 2:1 resonance with the planet. As the orbit shrinks it becomes more eccentric, until by the time its semimajor axis has shrunk by a factor of four, its eccentricity reaches nearly unity (1-e<<10^{-4}). In typical planetary systems, bodies in this high-eccentricity phase are likely to be consumed by the central star. If they can avoid this fate, as migration continues the inclination flips from 0 to i=180 degrees; thereafter the eccentricity declines until the semimajor axis is a factor of nine smaller than at capture, at which point the small body is released from the 2:1 resonance on a nearly circular retrograde orbit. Small bodies captured into resonance from initially inclined or eccentric orbits can also be ejected from the system, or released from the resonance on highly eccentric polar orbits (i\simeq 90 degrees) that are stabilized by a secular resonance. We conclude that migration can drive much of the inner planetesimal disk into the star, and that post-migration multi-planet systems may not be coplanar.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: when a planet migrates inward, how small celestial bodies (such as planetesimals) are captured into orbital resonances, and what kind of evolution and fate these captured small celestial bodies will experience during the continuous inward migration of the planet.
Specifically, the authors explored the following issues:
1. **Resonance capture mechanism**: When a planet migrates inward from a larger orbital radius, how will it capture smaller celestial bodies near its orbit into specific orbital resonances (for example, 2:1 resonance)? If the initial orbit is circular and coplanar, the small celestial body will be captured when it crosses the 2:1 resonance.
2. **Changes in orbital parameters**: After being captured, as the planet continues to migrate inward, the semi - major axis of the small celestial body gradually decreases, while its eccentricity increases. When the semi - major axis shrinks to one - fourth of its initial value, the eccentricity approaches 1 (that is, almost a parabolic orbit), which may cause the small celestial body to be swallowed by the central star.
3. **High - eccentricity and retrograde orbits**: If the small celestial body avoids being swallowed by the star, as the migration continues, the orbital inclination will flip (from 0 degrees to 180 degrees), and finally release an almost circular but retrograde orbit. In addition, for small celestial bodies with large initial orbital eccentricities or inclinations, they may be ejected from the system or stabilized in high - eccentricity polar orbits.
4. **Potential impacts on multi - planet systems**: The study also discussed the impacts of this inward migration and its accompanying resonance capture phenomenon on multi - planet systems, especially the possibility that the orbital planes in these systems are no longer coplanar, and different planets may not orbit in the same direction.
Through analytical methods and numerical simulations, the authors analyzed these processes in detail and concluded that an inward - migrating planet can drive a large number of inner planetesimals into the star, resulting in the post - migration multi - planet system may no longer be coplanar. This finding is of great significance for understanding the formation and evolution of closely - orbiting giant planets in the outer solar system.
### Related formulas
- **Delaunay elements**:
\[
L=(M_{\star}a)^{1/2}, \quad G = L(1 - e^{2})^{1/2}, \quad H = G\cos i, \quad \ell, \quad g=\omega, \quad h = \Omega
\]
where \(M_{\star}\) is the mass of the star, and \(a\), \(e\) and \(i\) are the semi - major axis, eccentricity and orbital inclination respectively; \(\ell\), \(\omega\) and \(\Omega\) are the mean anomaly, argument of periapsis and longitude of the ascending node respectively.
- **Kepler Hamiltonian**:
\[
H_{K}(L)=-\frac{M_{\star}^{2}}{2L^{2}}
\]
- **Mean motion**:
\[
n=\frac{\partial H_{K}}{\partial L}=\frac{M_{\star}^{2}}{L^{3}}=\left(\frac{M_{\star}}{a^{3}}\right)^{1/2}
\]
- **Adiabatic invariants**:
\[
C_{pq}=(p + q)L - pH=(M_{\star}a)^{1/2}[(p + q)-p(1 - e^{2})^{1/2}\cos i]
\]
- **Relationship between eccentricity and inclination**:
\[
\kappa=(1 - e^{2})^{1/2}\cos i = 1+\frac{q}{p}\left[1-\left(\frac{a_{i}}{a}\right)^{1/2}\right]
\]
These formulas describe the variation rules of the orbital parameters of small celestial bodies during the resonance capture process.