Chandra study of an overdensity of X-ray sources around two distant (z~0.5) clusters

M. Cappi,P. Mazzotta,M. Elvis,D.J. Burke,A. Comastri,F. Fiore,W. Forman,A. Fruscione,P. Green,D. Harris,E.J. Hooper,C. Jones,J.S. Kaastra,E. Kellogg,S. Murray,B. McNamara,F. Nicastro,T.J. Ponman,E.M. Schlegel,A. Siemiginowska,H. Tananbaum,A. Vikhlinin,S. Virani,B. Wilkes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/318998

2000-09-13

Abstract:We present results from a Chandra X-ray Observatory study of the field X-ray source populations in 4 different observations: two high-redshift (z~0.5) clusters of galaxies 3C295 and RXJ003033.2+261819; and two non-cluster fields with similar exposure time. Surprisingly, the 0.5-2 keV source surface densities (~900-1200 sources deg**-2 at a flux limit of 1.5x10**-15 erg cm**-2s**-1) measured in an ~8'x8' area surrounding each cluster exceed by a factor of ~2 the value expected on the basis of the ROSAT and Chandra logN-logS, with a significance of ~2 sigma each, or ~3.5 sigma when the 2 fields are combined (i.e. a probability to be a statistical fluctuation of <1% and <0.04%, respectively). The same analysis performed on the non-cluster fields and on the outer chips of the cluster fields does NOT show evidence of such an excess. In both cluster fields, the summed 0.5-10 keV spectrum of the detected objects is well fitted by a power-law with Gamma~1.7 similar to AGNs and shows no sign of intrinsic absorption. The few (~10 out of 35) optical identifications available to date confirm that most of them are, as expected, AGNs but the number of redshifts available is too small to allow conclusions on their nature. We discuss possible interpretations of the overdensity in terms of: a statistical variation of Cosmic Background sources; a concentration of AGNs and/or powerful starburst galaxies associated with the clusters; and g ravitational lensing of background QSO's by the galaxy clusters. All explanations are however difficult to reconcile with the large number of excess sources detected. Deeper X-ray observations and more redshifts measurements are clearly required to settle the issue.

Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the discovery of an excess of X - ray sources around two high - redshift (\(z\sim0.5\)) galaxy clusters. Specifically, the researchers used data from the Chandra X - ray Observatory and detected approximately twice as many X - ray sources as expected in two medium - redshift galaxy clusters (3C295 and RXJ003033.2 + 261819) and their surrounding areas. The surface density of these excess X - ray sources in the 0.5 - 2 keV energy band is approximately 900 - 1200 sources per square degree, which is significantly higher than the values predicted based on the logN - logS relationships of ROSAT and Chandra.

The main problem of the study is to determine the nature and origin of these excess X - ray sources and explore possible explanations, including:

1. **Statistical fluctuations of cosmic background sources**: Consider whether there are observational results due to natural fluctuations in the distribution of cosmic background sources.
2. **Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) or strong starburst galaxies associated with galaxy clusters**: Explore whether these excess X - ray sources could be AGNs or strong starburst galaxies associated with galaxy clusters.
3. **Gravitational lensing effect**: Analyze whether the brightening and clustering of background quasars (QSOs) are caused by the gravitational lensing effect of galaxy clusters.

The researchers explored the above possibilities through detailed spectral analysis, identification of optical counterparts, and comparison with other non - galaxy - cluster fields, and proposed further observational requirements to confirm the true nature of these excess X - ray sources.