Numerical hydrodynamics: SPH vs. AMR

Tomek Plewa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0008512
2000-08-31
Abstract:The advantages and disadvantages of two approaches to astrophysical hydrodynamics, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics and Adaptive Mesh Refinement, are briefly discussed together with some current problems of computational hydrodynamics.
Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore and compare two numerical methods in astrophysical fluid mechanics: Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) and Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR). The author discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these two methods and briefly reviews the development process from the early one - dimensional models to modern three - dimensional simulations, especially their applications in the problem of protostellar collapse. In addition, the paper also discusses some of the current challenges in computational fluid mechanics, such as the resolution problem when dealing with fluid discontinuities (e.g., shock waves), and the impact of different computing architectures on numerical simulations. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following key issues: 1. **Method Comparison**: Clearly point out the respective characteristics of SPH and AMR, including their capabilities and limitations in dealing with multi - dimensional fluid dynamics problems. 2. **Historical Review**: Review the development history of numerical fluid mechanics, especially the transition process from one - dimensional models to three - dimensional simulations. 3. **Technical Challenges**: Explore the technical problems encountered in current computational fluid mechanics, such as how to maintain a consistent resolution in different regions and how to efficiently use computing resources for large - scale simulations. 4. **Future Directions**: Propose directions for future research, especially in terms of improving algorithm efficiency and accuracy. Through these discussions, the author hopes to provide researchers with a comprehensive perspective so that they can make more informed decisions when choosing appropriate numerical methods.