Nonlinear stiffness, Lyapunov exponents, and attractor dimension

Julyan H. E. Cartwright

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601%2899%2900793-8

2000-07-22

Abstract:I propose that stiffness may be defined and quantified for nonlinear systems using Lyapunov exponents, and demonstrate the relationship that exists between stiffness and the fractal dimension of a strange attractor: that stiff chaos is thin chaos.

Chaotic Dynamics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

An Invariant Formulation of Special Relativity, or the "True Transformation Relativity," and its Comparison with Experiments

Tomislav Ivezic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0103026

2001-03-09

General Physics

Abstract:Different formulations of special relativity are theoretically discussed. First an invariant formulation, i.e., the ''true transformations (TT) relativity,'' is exposed. There a physical quantity is represented by a true tensor which comprises both components and a basis. Also the usual covariant formulation and the ''apparent transformations (AT) relativity'' are considered. It is shown that all the experiments are in agreement with the ''TT relativity'' but not always with the ''AT relativity.''
ON THE LOW SPEED LIMITS OF LORENTZ'S TRANSFORMATION - HOW RELATIVISTIC EFFECTS RETAIN OR VANISH IN ELECTROMAGNETISM

Hao Chen,Wei E. Sha,Xi Dai,Yue Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2528/pier22021701

2022-01-01

Abstract:This article contains a digest of the theory of electromagnetism and a review of the transformation between inertial frames, especially under low speed limits. The covariant nature of the Maxwell's equations is explained using the conventional language. We show that even under low speed limits, the relativistic effects should not be neglected to get a self-consistent theory of the electromagnetic fields, unless the intrinsic dynamics of these fields has been omitted completely. The quasi-static limits, where the relativistic effects can be partly neglected are also reviewed, to clarify some common misunderstandings and imprecise use of the theory in presence of moving media and other related situations. The discussions presented in this paper provide a clear view of why classical electromagnetic theory is relativistic in its essence.
Aether Theory and the Principle of Relativity

Joseph Levy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0607067

2008-03-28

Abstract:This paper completes and comments on some aspects of our previous publications. In ref [1], we have derived a set of space-time transformations referred to as the extended space-time transformations. These transformations, which assume the existence of a preferred aether frame and the variability of the one-way speed of light in the other frames, are compared to the Lorentz-Poincare transformations. We demonstrate that the extended transformations can be converted into a set of equations that have a similar mathematical form to the Lorentz-Poincare transformations, but which differ from them in that they connect reference frames whose co-ordinates are altered by the systematic unavoidable measurement distortions due to length contraction and clock retardation and by the usual synchronization procedures, a fact that the conventional approaches of relativity do not show. As a result, we confirm that the relativity principle is not a fundamental principle of physics [i.e, it does not rigorously apply in the physical world when the true co-ordinates are used]. It is contingent but seems to apply provided that the distorted coordinates are used. The apparent invariance of the speed of light also results from the measurement distortions. The space-time transformations relating experimental data, therefore, conceal hidden variables which deserved to be disclosed for a deeper understanding of physics.

General Physics
Special Relativity -- Applications to astronomy and the accelerator physics

Evgeny Saldin

2024-05-02

Abstract:There are many books on the classical subject of special relativity. However, after having spent a number of years, both in relativistic engineering and research with relativity, I have come to the conclusion that there exist a place for a new book. I do believe that the present book is not quite the same as the others, mainly due to attempt to cast light on dark corners. I should make it clear what this little book is not. It is not a textbook on relativity theory. What the book is about is the nature of special relativistic kinematics, its relation to space and time, and the operational interpretation of coordinate transformations. Every theory contains a number of quantities that can be measured by experiment and an expressions that cannot possibly be observed. Whenever we have a theory containing an arbitrary convention, we should examine what parts of the theory depend on the choice of that convention and what parts do not. The distinction is not always made and many authors claim some data to be observable, according to arbitrary conventions, which do not correspond to any physical experiment. This leads to inconsistencies and paradoxes that should be avoided at all cost.

Classical Physics,Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Accelerator Physics
Primary and reciprocal space-time experiments, relativistic reciprocity relations and Einstein's train-embankment thought experiment

J. H. Field

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0807.0158

2011-11-11

Abstract:The concepts of primary and reciprocal experiments and base and travelling frames in special relativity are concisely described and applied to several different space-time experiments. These include Einstein's train/embankment thought experiment and a related thought experiment, due to Sartori, involving two trains in parallel motion with different speeds. Spatially separated clocks which are synchronised in their common proper frame are shown to be so in all inertial frames and their spatial separation to be Lorentz invariant. The interpretions given by Einstein and Sartori of their experiments, as well as those given by the present author in previous papers, are shown to be erroneous.

General Physics
How the Michelson and Morley experiment was reinterpreted by special relativity

Alejandro Cassini,Leonardo Levinas

2024-09-06

Abstract:We elucidate how different theoretical assumptions bring about radically different interpretations of the same experimental result. We do this by analyzing special relativity as it was originally formulated. Then, we examine the relationship of the theory with the result of the Michelson and Morley experiment. We point out that in diverse a historical context the same experiment can be thought of as providing different conceptualizations of phenomena. This demonstrates why special relativity prevailed over its rival theories. This theory made a new reinterpretation of the experiment by associating it with a novel phenomenon, namely, the invariance of the speed of light, a phenomenon that was not the one originally investigated. This leads us to an understanding of how this experiment could have been interpreted in a completely different historical context.

History and Philosophy of Physics
Comparing Equivalent Gravities: common features and differences

Salvatore Capozziello,Vittorio De Falco,Carmen Ferrara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10823-x

2022-12-03

Abstract:We discuss equivalent representations of gravity in the framework of metric-affine geometries pointing out basic concepts from where these theories stem out. In particular, we take into account tetrads and spin connection to describe the so called {\it Geometric Trinity of Gravity}. Specifically, we consider General Relativity, constructed upon the metric tensor and based on the curvature $R$; Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity, formulated in terms of torsion $T$ and relying on tetrads and spin connection; Symmetric Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity, built up on non-metricity $Q$, constructed from metric tensor and affine connection. General Relativity is formulated as a geometric theory of gravity based on metric, whereas teleparallel approaches configure as gauge theories, where gauge choices permit not only to simplify calculations, but also to give deep insight into the basic concepts of gravitational field. In particular, we point out how foundation principles of General Relativity (i.e the Equivalence Principle and the General Covariance) can be seen from the teleparallel point of view. These theories are dynamically equivalent and this feature can be demonstrated under three different standards: (1) the variational method; (2) the field equations; (3) the solutions.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Theory
An approach to directly probe simultaneity

Edward T. Kipreos,Riju S. Balachandran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732316501571

2016-08-16

Abstract:The theory of special relativity derives from the Lorentz transformation. The Lorentz transformation implies differential simultaneity and light speed isotropy. Experiments to probe differential simultaneity should be able to distinguish the Lorentz transformation from a kinematically-similar alternate transformation that predicts absolute simultaneity, the absolute Lorentz transformation. Here, we describe how published optical tests of light speed isotropy/anisotropy cannot distinguish between the two transformations. We show that the shared equations of the two transformations, from the perspective of the "stationary" observer, are sufficient to predict null results in optical resonator experiments and in tests of frequency changes in one-way light paths. In an influential 1910 exposition on differential simultaneity, Comstock described how a "stationary" observer would observe different clock readings for spatially-separated "moving" clocks. The difference in clock readings is an integral aspect of differential simultaneity. We derive the equation for the difference in clock readings and show that it is equivalent to the Sagnac correction that describes light speed anisotropies in satellite communications. We describe an experimental strategy that can measure the differences in spatially-separated clock times to allow a direct probe of the nature of simultaneity.

General Physics
Dynamical 3-Space: neo-Lorentz Relativity

Reginald T Cahill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1207.1430

2012-07-05

Abstract:The major extant relativity theories - Galileo's Relativity (GaR), Lorentz's Relativity (LR) and Einstein's Special Relativity (SR), with the latter much celebrated, while the LR is essentially ignored. Indeed it is often incorrectly claimed that SR and LR are experimentally indistinguishable. Here we show that (i) SR and LR are experimentally distinguishable, (ii) that comparison of gas-mode Michelson interferometer experiments with spacecraft earth-flyby Doppler shift data demonstrate that it is LR that is consistent with the data, while SR is in conflict with the data, (iii) SR is exactly derivable from GaR by means of a mere linear change of space and time coordinates that mixes the Galilean space and time coordinates. So it is GaR and SR that are equivalent. Hence the well-known SR relativistic effects are purely coordinate effects, and cannot correspond to the observed relativistic effects. The connections between these three relativity theories has become apparent following the discovery that space is an observable dynamical textured system, and that space and time are distinct phenomena, leading to a neo-Lorentz Relativity (nLR). The observed relativistic effects are dynamical consequences of nLR and 3-space. In particular a proper derivation of the Dirac equation from nLR is given, which entails the derivation of the rest mass energy mc^2

General Physics
Revisiting special relativity: a natural algebraic alternative to Minkowski spacetime

James M Chappell,Azhar Iqbal,Nicolangelo Iannella,Derek Abbott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051756

IF: 3.7

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Minkowski famously introduced the concept of a space-time continuum in 1908, merging the three dimensions of space with an imaginary time dimension [Formula: see text], with the unit imaginary producing the correct spacetime distance [Formula: see text], and the results of Einstein's then recently developed theory of special relativity, thus providing an explanation for Einstein's theory in terms of the structure of space and time. As an alternative to a planar Minkowski space-time of two space dimensions and one time dimension, we replace the unit imaginary [Formula: see text], with the Clifford bivector [Formula: see text] for the plane that also squares to minus one, but which can be included without the addition of an extra dimension, as it is an integral part of the real Cartesian plane with the orthonormal basis [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. We find that with this model of planar spacetime, using a two-dimensional Clifford multivector, the spacetime metric and the Lorentz transformations follow immediately as properties of the algebra. This also leads to momentum and energy being represented as components of a multivector and we give a new efficient derivation of Compton's scattering formula, and a simple formulation of Dirac's and Maxwell's equations. Based on the mathematical structure of the multivector, we produce a semi-classical model of massive particles, which can then be viewed as the origin of the Minkowski spacetime structure and thus a deeper explanation for relativistic effects. We also find a new perspective on the nature of time, which is now given a precise mathematical definition as the bivector of the plane.
A brief and transparent derivation of the Lorentz-Einstein transformations via thought experiments

Bernhard Rothenstein,Stefan Popescu,George J. Spix

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0602054

2006-02-09

Abstract:Starting with a thought experiment proposed by Kard, which derives the formula that accounts for the relativistic effect of length contraction, we present a "two line" transparent derivation of the Lorentz-Einstein transformations for the space-time coordinates of the same event. Our derivation make uses of Einstein's clock synchronization procedure

General Physics
Lorentz and "apparent" transformations of the electric and magnetic fields

Tomislav Ivezic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0607189

2006-07-21

Abstract:It is recently discovered that the usual transformations of the three-dimensional (3D) vectors of the electric and magnetic fields differ from the Lorentz transformations (LT) (boosts) of the corresponding 4D quantities that represent the electric and magnetic fields. In this paper, using geometric algebra formalism, this fundamental difference is examined representing the electric and magnetic fields by bivectors.

General Physics
Relativistic velocity addition and the relativity of space and time intervals

J.H.Field

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0610065

2009-02-06

Abstract:A thought experiment first proposed by Sartori is analysed using the parallel velocity addition formula of special relativity. The distances and proper-time intervals between some similarly defined spatial coincidence events are found to be widely different in different inertial frames. This relativity of space and time intervals is quite distinct from the well-known time-dilatation and length contraction effects of special relativity. Sartori's claimed derivation of the parallel velocity addition formula, assuming relativistic time dilatation, based on the thought experiment, is shown to be fortuitous.

General Physics
Resolution of two fundamental issues in the dynamics of relativity and exposure of a real version of the emperor's new clothes

Changbiao Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.03200

2017-02-08

General Physics

Abstract:In this paper, we aim to resolve two fundamental issues in the dynamics of relativity: (i) Under what condition, the time-column space integrals of a Lorentz four-tensor constitute a Lorentz four-vector, and (ii) under what condition, the time-element space integral of a Lorentz four-vector is a Lorentz scalar; namely two "conservation laws", which are mispresented in traditional textbooks, and widely used in fundamental research, such as relativistic analysis of the momentum of light in a medium, and the proofs of the positive mass theorem in general relativity. To resolve issue (i), we have developed a generalized Lorentz \emph{four-vector} theorem based on the principles of classical mathematical analysis, with a simplified analytic example given to illustrate how to transform a space integral from one inertial frame to another, and a strict mathematical derivation provided to confirm the effect of Lorentz contraction. We use this four-vector theorem to verify M{\o}ller's theorem, and surprisingly find that M{\o}ller's theorem is fundamentally wrong. We provide a corrected version of M{\o}ller's theorem. We also use this four-vector theorem to analyze a plane light wave in a moving uniform medium, and find that the momentum and energy of Minkowski quasi-photon constitute a Lorentz four-vector and Planck constant is a Lorentz invariant. To resolve issue (ii), we have developed a generalized Lorentz \emph{scalar} theorem. We use this theorem to verify the "invariant conservation law" in relativistic electrodynamics, and unexpectedly find that it is also fundamentally wrong. Thus the two "conservation laws" in traditional textbooks, which have magically attracted several generations of most outstanding scientists, turned out to be imaginary, just like the emperor's new clothes; creating a scientific myth in the modern theoretical and mathematical physics: Believing is seeing.
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

Clifford M. Will

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2006-3

2006-04-04

Abstract:The status of experimental tests of general relativity and of theoretical frameworks for analysing them is reviewed. Einstein's equivalence principle (EEP) is well supported by experiments such as the Eotvos experiment, tests of special relativity, and the gravitational redshift experiment. Future tests of EEP and of the inverse square law are searching for new interactions arising from unification or quantum gravity. Tests of general relativity at the post-Newtonian level have reached high precision, including the light deflection, the Shapiro time delay, the perihelion advance of Mercury, and the Nordtvedt effect in lunar motion. Gravitational-wave damping has been detected in an amount that agrees with general relativity to better than half a percent using the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar, and other binary pulsar systems have yielded other tests, especially of strong-field effects. When direct observation of gravitational radiation from astrophysical sources begins, new tests of general relativity will be possible.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Michelson-Morley Experiments: at the crossroads of Relativity, Cosmology and Quantum Physics

Maurizio Consoli,Alessandro Pluchino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X2330017X

2024-02-19

Abstract:Quantum nonlocality would naturally fit into a version of relativity with a preferred reference system. However, acceptance of this idea has traditionally required experimental evidence. Namely, detecting in laboratory a small angular dependence of the velocity of light correlated to the cosmic motion of the Earth. Here, we summarize a new theoretical framework where the tiny, irregular residuals observed so far, from Michelson-Morley to current experiments of laser interferometry, can indeed be understood in terms of the Earth motion in the Cosmic Microwave Background observed directly with satellites in space. Our results, challenging the usual null interpretation, emphasize the central role of 'ether-drift' experiments for Relativity, Cosmology and Quantum Physics.

General Physics
An alternative to relativistic transformation of special relativity based on the first principles

Young-Sea Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0812.5029

2008-12-30

Abstract:A new relativistic transformation in the velocity space (here named the differential Lorentz transformation) is formulated solely from the principle of relativity and the invariance of the speed of light. The differential Lorentz transformation is via transforming physical quantities, instead of space-time coordinates, to make laws of nature form-invariant. The differential Lorentz transformation may provide a way to resolve the incompatibility of the theory of special relativity and the quantum theory.

Classical Physics
Inertial Transformations and the Nonexistence of Tachyons for Spacetime Dimension Greater than Two

David Acton,Owen Doyle,Michael P. Tuite

2024-10-29

Abstract:We consider real linear transformations between two inertial frames with constant relative speed $v$ in a $d$-dimensional spacetime where light moves with constant speed $c=1$ (for some chosen units) in all frames. For $d=2$ we show that the standard relative velocity formula holds and that any associated anisotropic conformal factor is multiplicative under composition of inertial transformations for $|v|\neq 1$. Assuming that the inertial transformation matrix is continuous in a neighbourhood of $v=0$ and differentiable at $v=0$, we determine the conformal factor for all $|v|\neq 1$. For an isotropic spacetime, the general solution reduces to the standard $d=2$ Lorentz transformation for $|v|<1$ or to a Tachyonic transformation for $|v|>1$, first described by Parker in 1969. For $d>2$ we show that no Tachyonic-like inertial transformations exist which are compatible with constant light speed.

High Energy Physics - Theory
Time, Topology and the Twin Paradox

J.-P. Luminet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0910.5847

2009-10-30

Abstract:The twin paradox is the best known thought experiment associated with Einstein's theory of relativity. An astronaut who makes a journey into space in a high-speed rocket will return home to find he has aged less than a twin who stayed on Earth. This result appears puzzling, since the situation seems symmetrical, as the homebody twin can be considered to have done the travelling with respect to the traveller. Hence it is called a "paradox". In fact, there is no contradiction and the apparent paradox has a simple resolution in Special Relativity with infinite flat space. In General Relativity (dealing with gravitational fields and curved space-time), or in a compact space such as the hypersphere or a multiply connected finite space, the paradox is more complicated, but its resolution provides new insights about the structure of spacetime and the limitations of the equivalence between inertial reference frames.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Classical Physics
Recent Experimental Tests of Special Relativity

Peter Wolf,Sebastien Bize,Michael E. Tobar,Frederic Chapelet,Andre Clairon,Andre N. Luiten,Giorgio Santarelli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34523-X_16

2005-06-22

Abstract:We review our recent Michelson-Morley (MM) and Kennedy-Thorndike (KT) experiment, which tests Lorentz invariance in the photon sector, and report first results of our ongoing atomic clock test of Lorentz invariance in the matter sector. The MM-KT experiment compares a cryogenic microwave resonator to a hydrogen maser, and has set the most stringent limit on a number of parameters in alternative theories to special relativity. We also report first results of a test of Lorentz invariance in the SME (Standard Model Extension) matter sector, using Zeeman transitions in a laser cooled Cs atomic fountain clock. We describe the experiment together with the theoretical model and analysis. Recent experimental results are presented and we give a first estimate of components of the $\tilde{c}^p$ parameters of the SME matter sector. A full analysis of systematic effects is still in progress, and will be the subject of a future publication together with our final results. If confirmed, the present limits would correspond to first ever measurements of some $\tilde{c}^p$ components, and improvements by 11 and 14 orders of magnitude on others.

Classical Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Nonlinear stiffness, Lyapunov exponents, and attractor dimension

An Invariant Formulation of Special Relativity, or the "True Transformation Relativity," and its Comparison with Experiments

ON THE LOW SPEED LIMITS OF LORENTZ'S TRANSFORMATION - HOW RELATIVISTIC EFFECTS RETAIN OR VANISH IN ELECTROMAGNETISM

Aether Theory and the Principle of Relativity

Special Relativity -- Applications to astronomy and the accelerator physics

Primary and reciprocal space-time experiments, relativistic reciprocity relations and Einstein's train-embankment thought experiment

How the Michelson and Morley experiment was reinterpreted by special relativity

Comparing Equivalent Gravities: common features and differences

An approach to directly probe simultaneity

Dynamical 3-Space: neo-Lorentz Relativity

Revisiting special relativity: a natural algebraic alternative to Minkowski spacetime

A brief and transparent derivation of the Lorentz-Einstein transformations via thought experiments

Lorentz and "apparent" transformations of the electric and magnetic fields

Relativistic velocity addition and the relativity of space and time intervals

Resolution of two fundamental issues in the dynamics of relativity and exposure of a real version of the emperor's new clothes

The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

Michelson-Morley Experiments: at the crossroads of Relativity, Cosmology and Quantum Physics

An alternative to relativistic transformation of special relativity based on the first principles

Inertial Transformations and the Nonexistence of Tachyons for Spacetime Dimension Greater than Two

Time, Topology and the Twin Paradox

Recent Experimental Tests of Special Relativity