Urinary Colloids [Abstract]
N. F. Maclagan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003591575805100505
1958-05-01
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine
Abstract:TZiE colloidal properties of urine have attracted attention for many years and have formed the basis of two apparently contradictory theories of the pathogenesis of renal calculi. Thus Joly (1931, 1939) and Butt et al. (1952) consider that urinary colloids have a protective action by delaying the precipitation of insoluble substances. On the other hand Boyce et al. (1954) described in the urine of their calculous patients a gross excess of mucoprotein, which was assumed to act by forming an insoluble calcium complex. Studies on urinary mucoprotein secretion previously reported from this department (Lockey et al., 1956) indicated a slightly lowered excretion in certain cases of renal calculi and appeared to favour the first of these theories, but no general method for assessing the "protective colloid efficiency" (P.C.E.) of urine was available at that time. Such a method was accordingly devised in collaboration with Dr. A. J. Anderson and is published in detail elsewhere (Maclagan and Anderson, 1958a). In brief this method consists of adding solutions ofcalcium chloride and sodium phosphate to a buffered preparation of dialysed urine, followed by centrifugation under controlled conditions. The amount of phosphate remaining in the supematant fluid is then estimated by a standard method and gives a measure of the protective colloid efficiency. Values for P.C.E., expressed as ug.P/100 ml. of dialysed urine, are normally from 0 to + 400 (240 + 39) but may vary pathologically from200 to + 2,000. In assessing the results it was found to be essential to separate cases with proteinuria from those without, as the presence of albumins and globulins was usually associated with abnormally high P.C.E. values. In 13 cases of renal calculi without proteinuria the results were slightly below normal (144 ± 46 pg.P/100 ml.) but the difference was not statistically significant, and only two of these cases gave results actually below normal limits. Most of the other pathological states studied gave a proportion of high values for P.C.E., a tendency which was particularly marked in rheumatism and cancer. A few abnormally low values were, however, also recorded, e.g. in peptic ulcer and in paraplegia. It was particularly noteworthy that no high values either for P.C.E. or for any of the colloidal constituents were recorded in cases of renal calculi without proteinuria. Parallel with the P.C.E. tests, estimations of various colloidal constituents were made and the P.C.E. was found to be positively correlated with most of these such as nitrogen, reducing activity, sulphur, hexosamine, and sialic acid. The results as a whole suggest that many different urinary colloids have some protective action in diminishing the precipitation of sparingly soluble substances, but no significant alteration in this property was demonstrated in cases of renal calculi. Equally, no increase of any colloidal substance seemed to be present, so that in this series at least there is nothing to support either of the two theories referred to above. It appears to be most important for any future studies of urinary colloids to take account of the dominating influence of clinical proteinuria, which, when present, is usually associated with an increased excretion of many proteins and mucopolysaccharides which must obscure the original picture.