Abstract:The deficit of mineral resources, the aggravation of environmental problems in the world, the decrease in non-renewable resources determined the increasing role of the responsibility of enterprises for the direct and indirect impact on the economic, environmental and social systems of their functioning. The systematization of scientific work in the field of corporate social responsibility showed the lack of comprehensive studies concerning the nature and strength of the impact of direct and latent factors on enterprises’ compliance with the principles of corporate social responsibility. In this research study, we hypothesized that the common contributing factors for corporate social responsibility benefits in the literature such as institutional pressures, market/societal pressures, and structural support are mediated by the factors of stakeholder influence and supervision effect. The data from an empirical survey of 334 corporate executives were collected to test our hypotheses of mediating effects. The partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach was used to test the 11 hypotheses from the research model. The research model is statistically significant with an explanatory power of R2 = 0.468 for the dependent variable CSR benefits. The statistical results show that the direct effects of the three common contributing factors to CSR are not significant. All the standardized path coefficients (β) of direct effects from institutional pressures, market/societal pressures, and structural support to corporate social responsibility benefits are less than 0.1. On the other hand, their effects are significant through the mediating factors of stakeholder influence and supervision. If we characterize stakeholder influence as words and supervision effect as deeds, then words are more significant than deeds (the path coefficient from supervision effect to corporate social responsibility benefits is 0.243, while from stakeholder influence to corporate social responsibility benefits is 0.443). Moreover, if we characterize external pressures as a stick and structural support as carrot, our research results show that stick (0.413 for market/societal pressures, 0.387 for institutional pressures) is more significant than the carrot (0.115) in effectuating corporate social responsibility benefits. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Stakeholders, Supervision, Mediating Effect, Factors of Influence.

An Empirical Study on the Impact of Social Responsibility on Financial Performance of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Enterprises

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation on Enterprises' Financial Performance—Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Research on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance of Chemical Companies

RETRACTED: Research on the impact of social responsibility of state-owned enterprises and private enterprises on financial performance

Influence Mechanism between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from China

The effects of corporate social responsibility on innovation and performance of firms in China: a structural equation model analysis

Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance: A Case Study of over One Hundred Large Enterprises in China

The Impact of Supply Chain Social Responsibility on Sustainable Performance

Exploring the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Media Attention

Corporate social responsibility, debt financing cost and enterprise innovation

Research on the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Behavior on Financial Performance from the Perspective of Optimal Differentiation

Empirical Research on the Impact of Institutional Investors' Shareholding Ratio on Corporate Social Responsibility

Can Corporate Environmental Social Responsibility and Financial Performance Achieve a Win-win Situation in China? -From the Perspective of Executive Social Capital

Corporate social responsibility, internal control, and firm financial performance

Corporate Social Responsibility, Analyst Focus and Firm Performance

Comparation of differences in the performance of corporate social responsibility between Chinese and American pharmaceutical enterprises—based on corporate social responsibility report

The Impact of CSR and Financial Distress on Financial Performance—Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies of the Manufacturing Industry

Research on Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and Performance of Pharmaceutical Companies: Based on the Perspective of Institutional Investor Governance

The effect of corporate social responsibility performance on financial performance: the case of food industry

Mediating Effects of Stakeholders and Supervision on Corporate Social Responsibility

The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review